SciΠvot: Benchmarking Principal-Investigator Judgment at Pivotal Moments of Scientific AutoResearch Agents
What this work does
SciΠvot evaluates whether research agents make sound decisions at pivotal moments, using 248 cases derived from human interventions across 26 projects. Frontier models often preferred the original agent plan over the human correction, exposing a major scientific-judgment gap.
THE RESEARCH CONVERSATION
Discussion & reactions
Share a question, an insight, or a replication experience. Sign in with GitHub to join the conversation.