Huan-ang Gao, Jiayi Geng, Wenyue Hua et al.
Organizes evolving agents by component, update timing, learning mechanism and application domain, covering model, context, tool and architecture changes.
Discovery relevance
Supplies a systematic map of mechanisms that can improve and retain discovery capabilities.
Yixuan Tang, Yi Yang
Compares agent-generated research ideas with human papers and follow-on research using measures of exploration breadth, distance from seed literature and alignment with future work.
Discovery relevance
An empirical audit of whether scientific ideation expands exploration, useful for evaluating open-ended discovery claims.
Haodong Lu, Dong Gong
Carries LoRA updates across tasks and distills a frozen teacher conditioned on verifier-accepted trajectories, optionally removing invalid-action turns.
Discovery relevance
A concrete alternative to treating every successful or failed generated token as a direct training target.
Juraj Gottweis, Wei-Hung Weng, Alexander Daryin et al.
Uses a multi-agent hypothesis-generation, critique and refinement system with scientist-provided objectives and feedback.
Discovery relevance
A reference for hypothesis-search orchestration and the separation between proposal ranking and external experimental evidence.
Sagar Deb, Devam Shah, Ashwanth Krishnan
Generates linear-Gaussian SCMs with an observe/intervene/submit protocol and separate skeleton, directed-graph and intervention-efficiency scores.
Discovery relevance
A direct environment for testing causal experiment selection separately from observational structure inference and overconfident edge commitment.
Zhiyuan He, Siwei Zhang, Zhiwen Zhou et al.
Trains agents within their actual runtime harness, explicitly handling prompt reconstruction, token-prefix compatibility, variable sample counts and rollout-level normalization.
Discovery relevance
A direct checklist for converting long scientific-agent traces into correctly aligned training samples.
Zhiheng Xi, Jixuan Huang, Chenyang Liao et al.
Decouples agent execution, environments and RL components, and increases the allowed interaction horizon in stages to balance early exploitation and later exploration.
Discovery relevance
A training infrastructure baseline for horizon curricula and controlled comparisons across discovery environments.
Yibo Wen, Han Liu
Runs budgeted design-build-test-learn campaigns, judging both the quality of measured designs and prediction/ranking of held-out designs.
Discovery relevance
A directly relevant benchmark for the separability of finding promising experiments and learning a reusable model under a limited measurement budget.
Xinlu Zhang, Ying-Chun Lin, Zhihan Zhang et al.
Rotates a small active set of harness variants according to mastery and learnability rather than training on a fixed prompt or uniformly large prompt pool.
Discovery relevance
Suggests evaluating discovery skills across paraphrased and structurally varied harnesses instead of measuring them only under the training interface.
Yuche Gao, Arik Reuter, Siyuan Guo et al.
A simulation-pretrained causal model conditions on observational and diverse intervention regimes to predict causal queries using intervention-aware representations.
Discovery relevance
Helps formalize discovery as narrowing an identified set, which can be useful even when the entire causal graph remains ambiguous.
Wenyu Du, Stephen Chung
Augments a persistent multi-agent scientific environment with supervisory guidance and periodic meta-reflection to maintain exploration without a single dense intermediate metric.
Discovery relevance
A concrete integrated system and evaluation setting for sustained computational scientific investigation.
Junlin Yang, Dylan Zhang, Xiangchen Song et al.
Samples hidden SCMs, permits bounded interventions and asks agents for both held-out predictions and an explicit graph/mechanism description.
Discovery relevance
A close benchmark for measuring whether successful answers are backed by recovered mechanisms and appropriate experiments.
Yujia Zheng, Vishal Verma, Mantej Gill et al.
Advocates keeping causal claims tied to explicit assumptions, data and formal algorithms while agents assist data inspection, method selection and interpretation.
Discovery relevance
A clear counterpoint to LLM-generated causal edges and a useful provenance contract for scientific harnesses.
Nicholas Tagliapietra, Gian Lorenzo Marchioni, Moritz Willig et al.
Partitions high-dimensional variables, combines LLM/human prior knowledge with data-driven discovery in local graphs, and merges results through hypothesis/critic agents.
Discovery relevance
Exposes a testable boundary between domain-knowledge proposals, statistical tests and final graph commitments in a harness.
Adam Ousherovitch, Ambuj Tewari
Treats inference strategies as operators on a base policy and derives strategy-dependent SFT/RL gradient weightings for pass@N, voting and best-of-N selection.
Discovery relevance
Motivates matching a discovery policy's training objective to the deployed search/selection harness instead of optimizing pass@1 in isolation.
Nan Huang, Mario Tapia-Pacheco, Kun Zhou et al.
Builds controlled data-integrity, analysis-verification and hypothesis-revision tasks around real datasets, including constructed conflicting-evidence dossiers.
Discovery relevance
A benchmark for evidence discipline and scientific judgment, complementary to task-completion or equation-recovery metrics.
Jenny Zhang, Shengran Hu, Cong Lu et al.
Evolves agent source code through an archive of candidate agents, selecting self-modifications using downstream coding performance.
Discovery relevance
Makes harness/code improvement a distinct object from model-weight training and preserves stepping stones beyond the current best agent.
Ling Yang, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu
Defines discovery foundation-model systems through revisable research states and seven coupled capabilities, with state-conditioned operations, experimental gating and validated cross-task discovery skills.
Discovery relevance
Connects problem discovery, representation construction, experiments, verification and learning as one discovery-system agenda.
Jianyuan Zhong, Chenwei Wu, Zhaochen Yu et al.
Evolves evidence-grounded hypothesis trees, compiles investigations into executable tasks, and reuses research histories through contribution credit, harness replay and subsequent rediscovery rounds.
Discovery relevance
Connects learned hypothesis development, executable research workflows and cumulative improvement of discovery procedures.
Amy Xin, Jiening Siow, Junjie Wang et al.
Coordinates existing CLI agents through permission boundaries, persistent artifacts, execution budgets and human supervision interfaces.
Discovery relevance
A concrete harness baseline for testing whether reliable state, evaluators and budget handling explain improvements attributed to agent intelligence.
Liming Pu, Xiaoxia Li, Yifu Liu et al.
CANOPY combines broader rollout exploration with reference-policy regularization to preserve useful outcome-reward variation and limit policy drift.
Discovery relevance
An empirical counterpoint to assuming long tasks necessarily require a process reward: first test coverage and reward-group signal.
Tianyu Fan, Chao Huang
Organizes harness candidates and matched outcome records as explicit interventions, producing both deployable designs and provenance-linked training examples for later model updates.
Discovery relevance
A useful data schema for jointly studying harness variation and the model-training data those variations generate.
Pengcheng Jiang, Zhiyi Shi, Kelly Hong et al.
Externalizes candidate pools, document memory, evidence graphs and curation state while training the policy to make semantic search and selection decisions.
Discovery relevance
A concrete division between reliable harness bookkeeping and trainable evidence-seeking decisions.
Yingzi Ma, Yulong Cao, Nanxi Li et al.
Trains a harness proposer at test time while keeping the executor fixed; generated prompts, skills and execution controls guide budgeted discovery rollouts whose feedback updates proposer weights.
Discovery relevance
A direct test-time learning mechanism for improving the procedure used to search for discoveries.
Jenny Zhang, Bingchen Zhao, Wannan Yang et al.
Integrates task solving and meta-level modification into one editable program, allowing archived agents to change both task behavior and the procedure that generates future modifications.
Discovery relevance
Makes the improvement procedure itself an experimental object for recursive discovery-system development.
Seungone Kim, Jiayi Geng, Young-Jun Lee et al.
Fifteen author-proposed, unpublished follow-up directions supply original papers, code, datasets, and task specifications. Agents submit a follow-up paper, code, and execution logs. Expert-verified direction-specific and integrity rubrics are graded by an agentic judge, separating integrity, completeness, and sufficiency. The main metric requires all three strict gates.
Discovery relevance
A concrete evaluation protocol for pursuing open scientific problems without a reference solution, with executable artifacts and evidence traceability. The primary contribution is a benchmark and evaluation method, so it belongs in Discovery Evaluation.
Mert Yuksekgonul, Daniel Koceja, Xinhao Li et al.
Learns during a single target problem using a tail-emphasizing entropic reward objective and state reuse that favors promising candidates while preserving exploration.
Discovery relevance
Distinguishes producing one exceptional verified artifact from maximizing average answer quality, and makes test-instance-specific policy learning explicit.
Tianshi Zheng, Kelvin Kiu-Wai Tam, Newt Hue-Nam K. Nguyen et al.
Mutates canonical physical-law expressions and embeds them in increasingly complex interactive model systems to test identification beyond familiar formulas.
Discovery relevance
A control against memorization and a way to evaluate active experimental design under known hidden equations.
Yanbo Wang, Jinhua Hao, Yuze Shi et al.
Updates an episode-specific adapter on agent, environment or summary text while downweighting spans repeatedly seen in earlier updates.
Discovery relevance
A baseline for learning from an evolving evidence stream without repeatedly reinforcing a stuck trajectory.
Chengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang et al.
Co-evolves a challenger and solver initialized from a base language model, using solver uncertainty and repetition controls to create a curriculum and self-consistency-derived training targets.
Discovery relevance
An enabling curriculum-generation and self-training mechanism for systems that expand their learning challenges.
Jiacheng Miao, Joe R. Davis, Yaohui Zhang et al.
Converts a paper and its code into an executable MCP server using environment setup, tutorial execution, reusable tool extraction, iterative testing and server assembly; the scientific LLM consumes the resulting tools, resources and prompts.
Discovery relevance
A concrete example of improving the discovery harness and reusable scientific tools without updating base-model weights. It motivates controlled model-by-harness ablations and checks of execution fidelity versus scientific validity.
Ali Essam Ghareeb, Benjamin Chang, Ludovico Mitchener et al.
Combines literature and data-analysis agents to suggest therapeutic hypotheses, interpret laboratory outputs and propose subsequent hypotheses.
Discovery relevance
Provides a real laboratory-feedback case with an identifiable hypothesis/experiment/update cycle.
Mengyang Liu, Weiming Wang, Haixin Nan et al.
SPROUT checkpoints both execution state and matching agent context at turn boundaries, then branches failed attempts through verifier-guided continuation selection.
Discovery relevance
A concrete harness requirement for reusing partial experimental progress during long-horizon RL.
Yucheng Xu, Keyi Zhang, Yuyang Yu et al.
Constructs data-analysis tasks with hidden evidence DAGs, synthesizes trajectories aligned with evidence primitives, and uses verified potential increments for turn-level RL.
Discovery relevance
A close precedent for collecting training trajectories and crediting intermediate scientific evidence.
Mattia Cerrato, Lennart Baur, Jannis Brugger et al.
Provides seven Gym-compatible scientific simulations with separate simulation and equation-problem interfaces for data collection and interpretable equation discovery.
Discovery relevance
A training interface for separating experiment collection, control reward and equation recovery within one discovery task.
Sanchit Kabra, Nurendra Choudhary, Jiangshu Du et al.
Searches a large dataset for multiple testable mechanisms using an agentic residual-driven discovery process that removes explained variation before subsequent searches.
Discovery relevance
Directly studies choosing what to investigate and accumulating multiple evidence-supported hypotheses.
Zhepei Wei, Wenlin Yao, Baolin Peng et al.
Alternates harness search proposed by the current policy with RL updates under the selected harness, carrying hard tasks and failure evidence into subsequent rounds.
Discovery relevance
A concrete co-evolution mechanism for jointly improving discovery policies and the harness that elicits their trajectories.
Jingxing Wang, Chenyu Zhou, Zhihui Fu et al.
Retrieves training trajectories, synthesizes a task-specific skill for a fixed-parameter solver, and optimizes benchmark-specific synthesis prompt slots from rollout feedback.
Discovery relevance
An important harness-adaptation baseline that can improve use of past experience without updating the solver's weights.
Qianru Meng, Xi Zhang, Konstantinos Papakostas et al.
Evolves a swarm of hypotheses, programs and experimental evidence through feedback-guided mutation, complementary component recombination and reuse of a shared research-state graph.
Discovery relevance
Connects scientific agent collaboration with retaining partial progress and reusing evidence across improvement rounds.
Chengyi Yang, Zhishang Xiang, Yunbo Tang et al.
Co-optimizes a test-question-conditioned curriculum synthesizer and solver using self-consistency and a difficulty signal favoring partially solvable generated questions.
Discovery relevance
A candidate for generating locally useful training problems when a target research problem is too difficult to produce positive rollouts directly.
Xuan Ouyang, Zefan Cai, Junjie Hu
Shapes selected MLP projections for next-context-state supervision and fits a prompt-specific fast-weight perturbation by ridge regression before generation.
Discovery relevance
An architectural memory/adaptation comparison for keeping long research evidence usable, separate from reward-driven agent learning.
Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange et al.
Orchestrates idea generation, novelty checking, code edits, executed experiments, plotting, manuscript writing and automated reviewing around supplied research templates.
Discovery relevance
An end-to-end harness baseline and a source of candidate trajectories for studying research-stage failures.
Andrej Karpathy
Research resource covering autoresearch, experiment loop.
Maxime Robeyns, Martin Szummer, Laurence Aitchison
Uses an evaluated archive to select a coding agent that edits its own implementation, tools and oversight mechanisms, retaining changes according to downstream benchmark utility.
Discovery relevance
An enabling example of improving the executable discovery harness through evaluated self-modification.
Jiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li et al.
Coordinates literature/implementation analysis, idea generation, algorithm implementation, validation and writing through iterative specialized-agent feedback.
Discovery relevance
Useful for separating implementation success, idea quality and empirical improvement when evaluating a research harness.
Andrew Zhao, Yiran Wu, Yang Yue et al.
One language model proposes and solves executable reasoning tasks, using validity and learnability signals to generate its own curriculum.
Discovery relevance
A concrete mechanism for collecting new verifiable tasks without a prewritten question-answer corpus.
Samuel Schmidgall, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang et al.
Specialized agents perform literature review, experimentation and report writing, with optional human feedback and a pool of scored experimental programs.
Discovery relevance
Shows how successful and failed execution feedback can be captured separately from the final report for training data collection.
Xufang Luo, Yuge Zhang, Zhiyuan He et al.
Records agent execution through a common transition interface and separates training from runtime orchestration, decomposing multi-call trajectories for credit assignment.
Discovery relevance
An infrastructure baseline for training an existing scientific-agent harness while preserving tool feedback and call provenance.
Yunpeng Zhai, Shuchang Tao, Cheng Chen et al.
Combines curiosity-guided task synthesis, experience-conditioned exploration and step-level attribution rewards to train tool-using agents efficiently.
Discovery relevance
Provides training and credit-assignment components for agents learning from synthesized tasks and accumulated interaction experience.
Samuel Schmidgall, Michael Moor
Allows independent agent laboratories to publish/retrieve reports from a shared archive and build on previous computational research.
Discovery relevance
A model of population-level research memory and reusable discovery artifacts beyond one agent's context window.
Mourad Gridach, Jay Nanavati, Khaldoun Zine El Abidine et al.
Reviews single- and multi-agent scientific workflows, implementations, datasets and task-dependent evaluation metrics.
Discovery relevance
Provides entry points into domain-specific systems and reliability questions across the research lifecycle.
Alexander Novikov, Ngân Vũ, Marvin Eisenberger et al.
Evolves executable candidate programs with an LLM ensemble, a program database and task-specific automated evaluators, using successful candidates and feedback in later prompts.
Discovery relevance
A strong frozen-model search baseline when evaluating the benefit of weight updates in discovery.
Shengran Hu, Cong Lu, Jeff Clune
A meta-agent writes and refines executable agent designs, storing prior candidates and their evaluations to guide later proposals.
Discovery relevance
Treats workflows, prompts and tool orchestration as searchable representations instead of assuming the harness is fixed.
Akarsh Kumar, Chris Lu, Louis Kirsch et al.
Uses foundation-model embeddings to search simulations for semantic targets, historical novelty and diverse collections of behaviors.
Discovery relevance
An explicit example of representation-dependent novelty: changing the observer embedding changes what counts as a new behavior.
Lianhao Zhou, Hongyi Ling, Cong Fu et al.
Synthesizes scientific agents as orchestration across scientists, natural language, code and physical processes, spanning the research lifecycle and levels of autonomy.
Discovery relevance
A complementary organizing perspective connecting agent interfaces with scientific evidence and human participation.
Yusuf Roohani, Andrew Lee, Qian Huang et al.
Uses an LLM agent to select genetic perturbations in batches, incorporating prior observations and optional literature, critic and gene-search tools.
Discovery relevance
A concrete scientific evidence-acquisition workflow and a useful test of whether a harness component actually benefits a given policy.
Kanishk Gandhi, Michael Y. Li, Lyle Goodyear et al.
Lets a scientist agent query a hidden probabilistic world, revise a model and communicate an explanation to a novice whose predictions evaluate that explanation.
Discovery relevance
A useful decomposition of evidence acquisition, model quality and reusable communication, rather than scoring only a final answer.
Jacqueline Maasch, John Kalantari, Kia Khezeli
Manually specified SCMs generate ARC-like observational, interventional and counterfactual demonstrations, enabling several reasoning and adaptation protocols.
Discovery relevance
A controlled comparison of reasoning with different causal evidence types and a task-family generalization test.
Patrick Tser Jern Kon, Jiachen Liu, Qiuyi Ding et al.
Architect/technician agents interact through modules that validate experimental procedures, partition plans, enforce dependencies and retain structured experiment knowledge.
Discovery relevance
A concrete harness contribution: experimental control and provenance can be evaluated independently of policy parameter updates.
DeepSeek-AI
Separates a correctness-reward RL-only reasoning experiment from a practical multi-stage pipeline combining cold-start supervision, RL, rejection sampling and distillation.
Discovery relevance
A baseline for verifiable-outcome optimization and for distinguishing successful-answer reinforcement from learning how to acquire unknown evidence.
Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Harshit Surana, Dhruv Agarwal et al.
Constructs discovery questions and reference hypotheses from published data-analysis workflows, with a separate synthetic dataset-generation route.
Discovery relevance
A fixed-data benchmark for hypothesis formulation, dataset interpretation and multistep analysis.
Justin Young
Research resource covering harness, long running agents.
Jiaqi Wei, Yuejin Yang, Xiang Zhang et al.
Combines workflow stages, autonomy levels and architectural mechanisms into a domain-oriented organization of agentic science.
Discovery relevance
Helps choose coverage categories and identify gaps between a workflow claim and the components actually evaluated.
Tianshi Zheng, Zheye Deng, Hong Ting Tsang et al.
Classifies LLM roles as tools, analysts and scientists across stages of the scientific method, pairing methods with benchmark and domain examples.
Discovery relevance
A navigation framework for the awesome list and for separating individual research-stage competence from end-to-end autonomy.
Ludovico Mitchener, Angela Yiu, Benjamin Chang et al.
Data-analysis and literature agents share a structured world model while pursuing multi-cycle research objectives and producing source-linked reports.
Discovery relevance
Motivates long-horizon memory, claim-level provenance and discovery-quality-versus-compute measurements.
Parshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta et al.
A frozen LLM proposes executable equation skeletons; numerical optimization fits constants, and scored programs are retained in a clustered experience buffer for iterative refinement.
Discovery relevance
A useful frozen-policy baseline against which to measure whether RL actually improves equation search efficiency or generalization.
Parshin Shojaee, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Kazem Meidani et al.
Combines transformed known equations and synthetic scientific terms to reduce simple formula recitation, evaluating both data fidelity and symbolic agreement.
Discovery relevance
Separates memorized scientific priors from fitting less familiar mechanisms and motivates hidden mechanism families in discovery evaluation.
Yu Sun, Xinhao Li, Karan Dalal et al.
Treats a small trainable model as recurrent hidden state, updated by a learned self-supervised loss, while outer training learns the surrounding projections and update behavior.
Discovery relevance
Provides a trainable memory mechanism that could consolidate observations during long discovery histories.
Jun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe et al.
Packages 75 Kaggle competitions with recreated grading, agent execution environments and leaderboard-derived human reference scores.
Discovery relevance
A practical long-horizon experimentation benchmark with executable outcomes and compute-sensitive comparisons.
Deepak Nathani, Lovish Madaan, Nicholas Roberts et al.
Provides modular Gym-style research tasks, shell-execution environments, datasets and agent interfaces across a 13-task ML benchmark.
Discovery relevance
A starting interface for collecting research-agent rollouts and testing alternative policies/harnesses under controlled task definitions.
Yunxiang Zhang, Muhammad Khalifa, Shitanshu Bhushan et al.
Uses seven research-oriented competitions with baseline-relative effectiveness, implementation evaluation and explicit runtime/memory constraints.
Discovery relevance
A strong counterweight to evaluating discovery solely through novelty prose or paper-review scores.
Maxence Faldor, Jenny Zhang, Antoine Cully et al.
Uses language/vision models to generate task descriptions and executable environments, train agents, and retain learned/failed tasks in an evolving archive.
Discovery relevance
A concrete model for generating discovery-training worlds and curricula from a persistent record of competence and failures.
Giulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn et al.
Agents implement research papers from scratch and are graded against hierarchical rubrics, including execution and result-match requirements after clean-environment reproduction.
Discovery relevance
Useful for instrumenting long-horizon research dependencies and measuring reproducible work rather than a plausible report alone.
Zihan Wang, Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang et al.
Trains multi-turn trajectories with state, reasoning, action and reward records; analyzes collapsed within-group reward variance and stabilizes updates with filtering and critic-related changes.
Discovery relevance
Useful for measuring whether exploration diversity and reward variance survive long discovery rollouts.
Hjalmar Wijk, Tao Lin, Joel Becker et al.
Evaluates agents and human experts on seven bounded AI R&D tasks with quantitative scoring and explicit time/compute conditions.
Discovery relevance
Shows why long single trajectories, repeated short attempts and total cost must be compared under a common budget.
Ziru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning et al.
Builds research-grounded programming tasks with heterogeneous datasets, expert-provided task knowledge and execution-based validation.
Discovery relevance
A benchmark for reliable implementation of individual scientific workflow steps before making end-to-end autonomy claims.
Bowen Jin, Hansi Zeng, Zhenrui Yue et al.
Optimizes search-interleaved LLM rollouts with PPO/GRPO and masks externally returned retrieval tokens from policy optimization.
Discovery relevance
A practical precedent for training tool selection from terminal rewards while respecting which trajectory tokens were actually generated by the policy.
Adam Zweiger, Jyothish Pari, Han Guo et al.
An outer RL loop selects generated training data and update directives; an inner supervised update applies those self-edits to model weights, rewarded by downstream adaptation quality.
Discovery relevance
A direct template for training how evidence is converted into learning updates, not only how evidence is gathered.
Yuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng et al.
Estimates labels by majority agreement among sampled answers, then uses agreement-based rewards for RL on otherwise unlabeled test questions.
Discovery relevance
A useful self-consistency baseline when external labels are unavailable.
Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu et al.
Combines idea generation, progressive experiment-tree search, analysis and manuscript generation, with experiment management and visual feedback.
Discovery relevance
A system baseline for the complete research workflow and for collecting traces of experimental branching and reporting.
Juan L. Gamella, Jonas Peters, Peter Bühlmann
Uses computer-controlled physical chambers with actuators and sensors to generate heterogeneous datasets and interventions over well-characterized systems.
Discovery relevance
A bridge between inexpensive synthetic discovery and controlled physical experimentation with known mechanisms.
Ekin Akyürek, Mehul Damani, Adam Zweiger et al.
Builds temporary adaptation data from few-shot demonstrations, with leave-one-out tasks and domain-specific transformations, then combines updated weights with prediction aggregation.
Discovery relevance
Suggests testing whether task-local examples support a useful inner-loop objective before introducing a complex RL adaptation policy.
Kyle Swanson, Wesley Wu, Nash L. Bulaong et al.
A principal-investigator agent coordinates specialized scientist/critic agents through meetings, producing a computational nanobody design pipeline with human guidance.
Discovery relevance
A real experimental-validation case for distinguishing proposal generation, computational scoring and physical evidence.
Ali Behrouz, Peilin Zhong, Vahab Mirrokni
Updates a neural associative memory with gradient-based surprise, momentum and forgetting, combined with attention and persistent learned memory.
Discovery relevance
A memory-design option for long evidence histories and selective retention.
Shuo Ren, Can Xie, Pu Jian et al.
Organizes scientific agents around planners, memory, action spaces and verifiers, distinguishing prompt-native planning from learned planning.
Discovery relevance
A mechanism-level index for separating harness design, policy learning and evidence verification in a discovery agent.
Zehan Qi, Xiao Liu, Iat Long Iong et al.
Uses unsuccessful web attempts to generate new curriculum instructions, learns an outcome reward model and controls update drift while reusing trajectory data.
Discovery relevance
A data-collection pattern for training from failures while tracking environment feedback and task difficulty.
Humza Nusrat, Omar Nusrat
Reconstructs three Kosmos radiobiology analyses and compares proposed gene signatures with random-gene or permutation null models.
Discovery relevance
A concrete example of claim-level discovery validation and of retaining negative findings rather than rewarding persuasive hypotheses.
Aohan Zeng, Mingdao Liu, Rui Lu et al.
Collects teacher-model interaction trajectories, filters by task reward and mixes accepted agent demonstrations with general-domain instructions for supervised tuning.
Discovery relevance
A concrete data-collection and SFT baseline before RL, with explicit environment transcripts and retention controls.
Andres M Bran, Sam Cox, Oliver Schilter et al.
A ReAct-style LLM invokes specialized chemistry/search/computation tools, with cloud-connected synthesis and a human-query tool.
Discovery relevance
Illustrates the difference between a capable scientific tool harness and a policy trained to choose informative experiments.
Avi Singh, John D. Co-Reyes, Rishabh Agarwal et al.
Alternates policy sampling with reward annotation and reward-weighted likelihood training, instantiated with correctness-filtered math/code solutions.
Discovery relevance
A simple self-training baseline that isolates whether expensive multi-turn RL is needed beyond verified trajectory reuse.
Emre Kıcıman, Robert Ness, Amit Sharma et al.
Behaviorally probes language models on multiple causal tasks and discusses connecting text-based prior knowledge with statistical and logical causal methods.
Discovery relevance
Useful for defining which parts of causal reasoning can be elicited from pretrained knowledge and which require new data or intervention evidence.
Peter Jansen, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Tushar Khot et al.
Provides interactive simulated investigations with instrument use, interventions, hypothesis formation and explanatory outputs.
Discovery relevance
A training/evaluation substrate for complete long-horizon investigations with separate process and knowledge measurements.
Yecheng Jason Ma, William Liang, Guanzhi Wang et al.
A frozen LLM proposes reward programs; inner-loop RL trains control policies and resulting task fitness/reflection guides reward-program evolution.
Discovery relevance
A template for learning or searching the training interface while keeping the final discovery evaluator externally specified.
Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Alexander Novikov et al.
A frozen LLM proposes programs while an evaluator and island-based program database retain useful candidates and construct subsequent prompts.
Discovery relevance
A necessary search-only baseline: externally verified discoveries can occur without any test-time parameter training.
Jenny Zhang, Joel Lehman, Kenneth Stanley et al.
Combines estimated learning progress with a foundation-model judgment of human interestingness to sample training tasks.
Discovery relevance
A way to distinguish useful, learnable research questions from unlimited novelty or raw prediction error.
Edward Hughes, Michael Dennis, Jack Parker-Holder et al.
Defines open-endedness relative to an observer through continuing novelty and learnability, then develops a position on foundation-model-based open-ended systems.
Discovery relevance
Provides a theoretical lens for asking whether discovery continues to yield learnable novelty over time.
Zi-Yi Dou, Cheng-Fu Yang, Xueqing Wu et al.
Generates candidate trajectories, retains successful ones and uses a reflector with environmental feedback to repair failed outputs before adding them to training.
Discovery relevance
A specific answer to how failed attempts can yield training data: preserve feedback and validate a correction instead of imitating the original error.
Moritz Hardt, Yu Sun
Retrieves related training sequences and fine-tunes a language model on their next-token objective at inference time, instead of placing all neighbors in the prompt.
Discovery relevance
A baseline for choosing what evidence to consolidate into weights rather than only storing it in context.
Andreas Sauter, Erman Acar, Vincent François-Lavet
Trains a recurrent policy across synthetic SCMs to choose budgeted interventions and edit an explicit graph estimate, rewarded by terminal graph accuracy and an intervention bonus.
Discovery relevance
Directly demonstrates that a discovery training problem can learn experiment selection and belief/graph updating jointly, beyond learning a representation alone.
Davin Choo, Themistoklis Gouleakis, Arnab Bhattacharyya
Uses a proposed causal DAG to guide adaptive interventions, with guarantees that depend on advice quality while retaining robustness to poor advice.
Discovery relevance
A useful design for combining LLM-generated causal hypotheses with experiments that verify or correct those hypotheses.
Nathan J. Szymanski, Bernardus Rendy, Yuxing Fei et al.
Combines literature-trained recipe proposals, robotic synthesis, XRD interpretation and thermodynamics-guided active learning to revise unsuccessful recipes.
Discovery relevance
A prospective physical discovery loop and a direct example of failed experiments serving as evidence for choosing the next experiment.
Daniil A. Boiko, Robert MacKnight, Ben Kline et al.
Connects an LLM planner to web/documentation search, code execution and laboratory automation, including chemistry and hardware-specific interfaces.
Discovery relevance
Shows why physical execution, documentation grounding and validation interfaces belong in a scientific-agent harness.
Kevin Ellis, Catherine Wong, Maxwell Nye et al.
Alternates solving tasks, compressing found programs into reusable library abstractions, and training a recognition model on replayed and generated tasks.
Discovery relevance
Separates improving a representation language from improving search within that language, making representation growth an explicit learning target.
Daniel J. Mankowitz, Andrea Michi, Anton Zhernov et al.
Learns policy/value-guided assembly-program search with separate correctness/latency value predictions and explicit instruction constraints.
Discovery relevance
A concrete long-horizon construction problem where dense correctness feedback, search and terminal performance have distinct roles.
Adaptive Agent Team, Jakob Bauer, Kate Baumli et al.
Meta-trains a large memory-based RL policy across a procedurally generated task space with an adaptive curriculum, enabling within-context adaptation to unseen embodied tasks.
Discovery relevance
An enabling foundation for learned experiment-like exploration and rapid adaptation in unfamiliar worlds.
Miles Cranmer
Asynchronous expression populations combine mutation, crossover, age regularization, migration, simplification and continuous constant optimization under accuracy/complexity tradeoffs.
Discovery relevance
A strong non-LLM search baseline and a concrete example of how a representation grammar and an optimizer jointly determine what can be discovered.
Nan Rosemary Ke, Silvia Chiappa, Jane Wang et al.
A transformer maps observational/interventional datasets to an autoregressive distribution over graph adjacency entries, trained on synthetic graph/data pairs.
Discovery relevance
A learned inference baseline that separates recovering structure from selecting which intervention data to acquire.
Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu et al.
Interleaves language reasoning, environment actions and returned observations in one trajectory, using prompting and optional fine-tuning.
Discovery relevance
A basic action/observation protocol for instrumenting discovery trajectories and comparing reasoning-only with interactive evidence acquisition.
Renat Aksitov, Sobhan Miryoosefi, Zonglin Li et al.
Separately prompted search/relevance/grounding steps generate trajectories that are scored and reused for self-training and smaller-model distillation.
Discovery relevance
Evidence against a blanket rule that only superficially correct intermediate steps should be retained; selection must match end-to-end objectives.
Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Edward Berman et al.
Stores verbal self-reflections from evaluated trials in memory and conditions later attempts on them without gradient-based policy updates.
Discovery relevance
An essential memory-only baseline for distinguishing harness adaptation from test-time weight training.
Amil Merchant, Simon Batzner, Samuel S. Schoenholz et al.
Graph-network energy predictors filter candidate crystals; DFT relaxation/evaluation adds verified computational labels for subsequent active-learning rounds.
Discovery relevance
Shows that discovery training can be supervised active learning with a computational oracle, providing a useful alternative to LLM-agent RL.
Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang et al.
An LLM proposes exploration tasks, writes executable skills and refines them from environment/error feedback; validated skills enter a growing retrieval library.
Discovery relevance
A model of persistent skill accumulation and endogenous task generation that can be transferred to scientific tool use.
Mikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang et al.
Combines recursive problem simplification, neural-guided search, large-scale pretraining, genetic programming and linear-model tokens in one modular symbolic-regression system.
Discovery relevance
A strong precedent for training a prior across problems and adapting search to a new discovery instance; useful for decomposing gains from model training and search harnesses.
Lars Lorch, Scott Sussex, Jonas Rothfuss et al.
Amortizes graph inference with a permutation-aware neural model trained on sampled graph/mechanism/data distributions under a forward-KL objective.
Discovery relevance
A useful model of learning an inference procedure across worlds; separates amortized causal inference from learning a policy to gather data.
Tristan Deleu, António Góis, Chris Emezue et al.
Constructs DAGs sequentially with a generative flow network trained to sample graphs proportionally to Bayesian scores rather than returning only a maximizing graph.
Discovery relevance
An alternative to reward maximization when discovery requires diverse plausible hypotheses and uncertainty-aware experimental design.
Phillip Lippe, Sara Magliacane, Sindy Löwe et al.
Learns visual causal representations from temporal transitions with observed intervention targets and an intervention-conditioned latent transition model.
Discovery relevance
Shows why observation representation and available intervention diversity must be specified before measuring discovery-policy ability.
Qin Wang, Olga Fink, Luc Van Gool et al.
Uses weight/augmentation-averaged teacher predictions and stochastic restoration toward source parameters while adapting across changing domains.
Discovery relevance
A precedent for retaining a stable reference policy and testing revisited worlds after online agent updates.
Alhussein Fawzi, Matej Balog, Aja Huang et al.
An AlphaZero-style policy/value network guides tensor-decomposition search; training combines played games, synthetic factorization demonstrations and problem symmetries.
Discovery relevance
A direct discovery-RL precedent showing how to obtain valid synthetic training instances when generating solutions is easier than solving the forward problem.
Shuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang et al.
Selects reliable, non-redundant samples for entropy adaptation and regularizes important parameters to reduce forgetting.
Discovery relevance
Suggests separate controls for update usefulness, compute cost and retained capability in a discovery-agent learning stream.
Arash Mehrjou, Ashkan Soleymani, Andrew Jesson et al.
Evaluates batch acquisition policies and counterfactual outcome estimators over curated genetic-intervention screens.
Discovery relevance
A reproducible finite-pool baseline for sample-efficient experiment selection using biological measurements.
Augustine Mavor-Parker, Kimberly Young, Caswell Barry et al.
Predicts both transition means and variances, subtracting a learned aleatoric term from prediction-error curiosity.
Discovery relevance
Useful when designing discovery rewards that should favor learnable uncertainty rather than irreducible noise.
Panagiotis Tigas, Yashas Annadani, Andrew Jesson et al.
Combines posterior uncertainty over graphs and mechanisms with information-based acquisition, selecting both intervention targets and values. Greedy and soft batch selection trade acquisition quality against computation.
Discovery relevance
A baseline for the experiment-action space: choosing what to manipulate and by how much are separate decisions.
Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu et al.
Iteratively generates rationales and fine-tunes on correct answers; rationalization conditions on known answers to recover additional training examples.
Discovery relevance
A reasoning-training comparison for success-filtered self-training, especially when contrasting known-answer tasks with discovery lacking answer labels.
Ruoyao Wang, Peter Jansen, Marc-Alexandre Côté et al.
Simulates elementary science tasks through interacting objects, simplified physical processes and executable textual actions.
Discovery relevance
A tool-use and experimental-execution baseline before testing novel mechanism discovery.
Bing Liu, Eric Robertson, Scott Grigsby et al.
Organizes autonomous learning around novelty detection, characterization, self-initiated data gathering, adaptation and continual incorporation of knowledge through human and environment interaction.
Discovery relevance
A direct conceptual foundation for agents that initiate investigations and learn from unknowns during deployment.
Yossi Gandelsman, Yu Sun, Xinlei Chen et al.
Adapts an image encoder to each test input with masked reconstruction while retaining a recognition head.
Discovery relevance
Illustrates both per-instance adaptation and the importance of selecting an auxiliary objective compatible with the downstream scientific task.
Johann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Phillip Lippe et al.
Uses paired observations before/after unknown interventions to learn latent causal variables and mechanisms, with explicit and implicit causal-model parameterizations.
Discovery relevance
A precise precedent for representation-level discovery with weak experimental supervision, rather than treating every new embedding as a discovered variable.
Adam Foster, Desi R Ivanova, Ilyas Malik et al.
Optimizes a design policy over entire experimental histories using sequential contrastive lower bounds on information gain. History pooling supports fast adaptive design after upfront training.
Discovery relevance
A direct precedent for learning experiment selection rather than merely solving a fixed question, with train-time amortization and test-time evidence gathering separated.
Brenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk et al.
An autoregressive recurrent policy emits expression trees and is optimized using the conditional reward of samples above a reward quantile.
Discovery relevance
Direct precedent for optimizing the best discovered result rather than average rollout reward; important when comparing discovery RL with ordinary task-solving RL.
Lars Lorch, Jonas Rothfuss, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.
Introduces a latent differentiable distribution over DAGs and performs approximate joint graph/parameter posterior inference with particle-based variational methods.
Discovery relevance
Supplies an uncertainty-bearing belief model for selecting interventions rather than collapsing immediately to one guessed causal graph.
T. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt et al.
Uses a recurrent expression generator to seed short genetic-programming runs and trains the generator using its own samples plus selected high-performing evolved expressions.
Discovery relevance
Shows how trajectories or candidates improved by a non-neural search process can become training data for a discovery proposal policy.
Yuejiang Liu, Parth Kothari, Bastien van Delft et al.
Combines self-supervised adaptation with stored source feature moments and online alignment, using contrastive supervision and feature queues.
Discovery relevance
A direct reason to validate that a test-time training signal aligns with discovery quality instead of assuming any self-supervised update helps.
Dequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu et al.
Updates normalization statistics and affine parameters online by minimizing prediction entropy on unlabeled target inputs.
Discovery relevance
A compact label-free adaptation baseline and a warning that optimizing confidence differs from acquiring reliable new evidence.
Bernhard Schölkopf, Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer et al.
Connects structural causal models, independent mechanisms and sparse distribution changes to the problem of learning causal variables from low-level observations.
Discovery relevance
Makes variable construction and mechanism learning distinct research targets; the representation is part of the discovery problem.
Mohsen Jafarzadeh, Akshay Raj Dhamija, Steve Cruz et al.
Formalizes open-world learning with and without labels, connecting novelty detection, clustering, instance management and incremental recognition in a modular learner.
Discovery relevance
Provides foundational vocabulary and evaluation distinctions for learning unknown categories and managing accumulated knowledge.
Rui Wang, Joel Lehman, Aditya Rawal et al.
Maintains a population of paired environments and agents, mutating challenges and transferring solutions, with a behavioral characterization separated from the environment encoding.
Discovery relevance
A curriculum-generation baseline in which stepping stones and transfer can produce tasks that a linear difficulty schedule misses.
Joris M. Mooij, Sara Magliacane, Tom Claassen
Pools datasets while explicitly representing their contexts as variables, then supplies context-to-system background constraints to suitable causal-discovery algorithms.
Discovery relevance
Provides a representation for accumulated experiments with heterogeneous interventions rather than treating all samples as exchangeable observational data.
Yu Sun, Xiaolong Wang, Zhuang Liu et al.
Jointly trains supervised and self-supervised tasks, then adapts shared parameters on an unlabeled test input using the auxiliary loss before prediction.
Discovery relevance
Suggests learning an update rule whose auxiliary signal can be obtained from observations when the desired test label is unavailable.
Luisa Zintgraf, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Maximilian Igl et al.
Learns a trajectory encoder and generative decoder for a posterior over task embeddings, then conditions a policy on that uncertainty to optimize online adaptation return.
Discovery relevance
A baseline for evaluating the value of information through later task performance while keeping posterior inference and action selection explicit.
Ishita Dasgupta, Jane Wang, Silvia Chiappa et al.
Meta-trains a recurrent policy to gather information before a rewarded causal query, with within-episode adaptation carried by recurrent state rather than new weight updates.
Discovery relevance
A concrete training formulation for choosing informative interventions and using their results to answer later causal questions.
Ben Krause, Emmanuel Kahembwe, Iain Murray et al.
Updates a Transformer-XL on already observed sequence segments before predicting later segments, treating weights as a short-term adaptation memory.
Discovery relevance
Establishes the causal ordering needed for test-time learning from newly acquired evidence without training on future targets.
Hu Xu, Bing Liu, Lei Shu et al.
Trains a class-independent meta-classifier over nearest examples, then recognizes enrolled classes and rejects unseen classes without retraining that meta-classifier for every class addition.
Discovery relevance
An early open-world knowledge-acquisition mechanism that makes recognition and incorporation of new categories explicit.
Xun Zheng, Bryon Aragam, Pradeep Ravikumar et al.
Represents acyclicity through a smooth matrix-exponential equality and optimizes a penalized structural-equation score with an augmented Lagrangian.
Discovery relevance
An interpretable structure-learning component or baseline inside an agent's model-building loop.
Marcin Andrychowicz, Filip Wolski, Alex Ray et al.
Replays failed goal-conditioned trajectories against alternative goals that their achieved states satisfy, recomputing the corresponding reward.
Discovery relevance
Inspires reuse of failed experiments as evidence for a different, explicitly stated target.
Jonas Peters, Peter Bühlmann, Nicolai Meinshausen
Tests whether a target's conditional predictive relationship is invariant across environments and intersects accepted predictor sets to obtain conservative causal statements.
Discovery relevance
A way to ask agents for mechanisms that survive environment changes rather than explanations that only fit one dataset.
Rein Houthooft, Xi Chen, Yan Duan et al.
Adds an approximate KL change in a Bayesian dynamics model to the external reward, using variational neural-network inference and a practical second-order approximation.
Discovery relevance
An implementation baseline for training evidence-seeking behavior from belief updates rather than raw environmental surprise.
Abhijit Bendale, Terrance Boult
Formalizes recognition with unknown rejection and subsequent category incorporation, deriving bounded open-space-risk conditions and a Nearest Non-Outlier classifier that supports incremental updates.
Discovery relevance
An early operational foundation for detecting unknowns and extending an agent's recognized knowledge over time.
Jonas Peters, Joris M. Mooij, Dominik Janzing et al.
Uses independence between causes and additive noise to identify causal direction under restrictions; RESIT searches for sinks by regression-residual independence and then removes unnecessary edges.
Discovery relevance
Demonstrates why observational discovery can work only after a mechanism-family assumption adds information beyond conditional independence.
Judea Pearl
Defines causal queries through autonomous structural mechanisms and intervention operations, separating model specification from statistical identification and estimation.
Discovery relevance
Requires an agent to state which intervention or counterfactual query its evidence supports and which causal assumptions are needed.
Jürgen Schmidhuber
Intrinsic reward compares old and improved compressors on the same accumulated data; the controller seeks expected future compression progress. The appendix separates compression length, runtime cost and delayed compressor-improvement feedback.
Discovery relevance
A candidate discovery objective is improvement in an agent-relative explanatory code, not novelty or prediction error alone.
Peter Grünwald
Contrasts two-part description length with refined universal coding and normalized maximum likelihood, exposing model-complexity costs that depend on a specified model family.
Discovery relevance
Provides an explicit fit-versus-complexity objective for candidate explanations, and a way to discuss changes in an effective hypothesis language.
Andrew Y. Ng, Daishi Harada, Stuart Russell
Characterizes potential-based shaping with the discount-consistent difference of successor and current potentials, preserving optimal policies under the stated MDP conditions.
Discovery relevance
A starting constraint when adding dense progress feedback to a sparse discovery objective.
No works match these filters.